Ok, I'm going to say what everyone is thinking:
Most (nearly all) of your points are incorrect, and your rebuttals to the evidence produced against your points are pretty much just a mixture of cognitive dissonance and ignorance.
Let me make this very clear:
- 7 EFTS *will* affect people, unless somehow we can pull the government around (unlikely, we hardly have much political clout). I was involved with the running of NZMSA this year, and I can quite categorically tell you this is the case.
- The pass/fail system does not produce lower-quality graduates. I'm unsure how you're still arguing against this when you've been pointed to peer-reviewed articles which disprove your theory, and you haven't provided any actual evidence to the contrary.
- The competitive first year entry is *much* fairer than selecting students straight out of high school (differences in schools are pretty big, rich kids would sail in), and much cheaper for students than forcing them to do an entire degree before starting medicine. There *is* a graduate entry scheme at both schools, and graduates make up ~1/3 of the class, so it's hardly like graduate entry isn't an option here.
- Training more medical graduates than the system can employ is ridiculous. You can't just take something bad that happens in some other fields, and decide that it has to apply to every field. It'd be an expensive, frustrating waste of time.
/this discussion
[offtopic] Someone had to do it... [/offtopic]
Most (nearly all) of your points are incorrect, and your rebuttals to the evidence produced against your points are pretty much just a mixture of cognitive dissonance and ignorance.
Let me make this very clear:
- 7 EFTS *will* affect people, unless somehow we can pull the government around (unlikely, we hardly have much political clout). I was involved with the running of NZMSA this year, and I can quite categorically tell you this is the case.
- The pass/fail system does not produce lower-quality graduates. I'm unsure how you're still arguing against this when you've been pointed to peer-reviewed articles which disprove your theory, and you haven't provided any actual evidence to the contrary.
- The competitive first year entry is *much* fairer than selecting students straight out of high school (differences in schools are pretty big, rich kids would sail in), and much cheaper for students than forcing them to do an entire degree before starting medicine. There *is* a graduate entry scheme at both schools, and graduates make up ~1/3 of the class, so it's hardly like graduate entry isn't an option here.
- Training more medical graduates than the system can employ is ridiculous. You can't just take something bad that happens in some other fields, and decide that it has to apply to every field. It'd be an expensive, frustrating waste of time.
/this discussion
[offtopic] Someone had to do it... [/offtopic]