I've messaged UCAT on ig about this and I'm waiting for a response...
Can anyone confirm to me whether I'm incorrect or UCAT is blatantly contradicting their recent statements in the question banks they have put out!
In this example it is an ASSUMPTION to say that "Some Europeans do not like trekking" because for all we know from the question all Europeans could not like trekking. Given what UCAT has said about "Some≠all" it is wrong to say that "Some Europeans do not like trekking" because ALL Europeans could not like trekking. See where I'm going here?
Another Example:
We only know of this one example of a substandard product being "useful and trendy". So to say that "Some substandard products are useful and trendy" is a conclusion that CANT be drawn! Given that all substandard products could be useful and trendy and, once again, SOME≠ALL.
This frustrates me because it's hard to gain a consensus on this from them. Do I follow my reasoning, or this question bank's reasoning when I sit the exam? One would think the question bank, but then UCAT replies agreeing with me, thus contradicting their mocks. These question make up one-third of the section!
Can anyone confirm to me whether I'm incorrect or UCAT is blatantly contradicting their recent statements in the question banks they have put out!
In this example it is an ASSUMPTION to say that "Some Europeans do not like trekking" because for all we know from the question all Europeans could not like trekking. Given what UCAT has said about "Some≠all" it is wrong to say that "Some Europeans do not like trekking" because ALL Europeans could not like trekking. See where I'm going here?
Another Example:
We only know of this one example of a substandard product being "useful and trendy". So to say that "Some substandard products are useful and trendy" is a conclusion that CANT be drawn! Given that all substandard products could be useful and trendy and, once again, SOME≠ALL.
This frustrates me because it's hard to gain a consensus on this from them. Do I follow my reasoning, or this question bank's reasoning when I sit the exam? One would think the question bank, but then UCAT replies agreeing with me, thus contradicting their mocks. These question make up one-third of the section!