Let me add a little more analysis to help in case the issue drags on.I sent an appeal yesterday and am currently waiting for a reply. I think the greater the number of people who question it, the greater likelihood we'll find out what's happened
Curtin would be extremely naive to again use the formula 60%(ATAR rank) + 40%(UMAT/UCAT score). I think they must have learned from their last time's error.
It's possible this year they could be using 60%(ATAR rank/99.95) + 40%(UCAT score/3600).
If so then 99.3+3250 (=0.9572) is indeed higher than 99.75+3220 (=0.9566).
However this formula is still far from being a valid method. Reason: a UCAT question is on average worth 15 UCAT marks. Plug 15 into this 60/40 formula it equates to 0.27 ATAR. Which means a 99.70 with one single UCAT question higher would be better than a 99.95.
Still not a valid method isn't it?