Why don't you just cut up one of the ill patients needing organs and distribute those among the remainder? There's no need to involve the other random healthy patient...There are 5 ill patients in a hospital. They all need urgent organ transplantation to survive otherwise they will die. 2 people need a kidney each, 2 need one side of lungs each, and one needs a heart. There's another healthy patient who's at the hospital for a routine check up. His organs are a match for all those 5 patients. If you take out the organs from the healthy patient, 5 ill patients survive. Should you kill 1 healthy patient to save 5 others? The end justifies the means.