Stuck on this S1 question

Discussion in 'UMAT Question Discussion' started by tod, Jul 20, 2017.

  1. tod

    tod New Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    In Jane's house one room has 7 lights in a row. Each light can either be switched ON or OFF. Jane makes the following two statements:
    1. More than 2 Lights are OFF
    2. Any OFF Light must not have exactly one adjacent ON light.

    Given that 1 is False and 2 is TRUE, how many different unique arrangements are possible?

    1. 5
    2. 9
    3. 12
    4. 16
     
  2. tod

    tod New Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    My answer was 5
     
  3. Sherlock

    Sherlock Breaker of order

    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    368
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Perhaps a good place to start would be to provide your method and how you got the answer 5.
     
    jiaxing and Dnnysn like this.
  4. A1

    A1 Certified Admissions Guru Moderator

    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    1,228
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Occupation:
    UWA MD minus-I
    Statement 1 false means we can have 0 or 1 or 2 lights off = 7 or 6 or 5 lights on. I worked out 9 patterns (o on x off)

    7 on = ooooooo
    6 on combos noting no 1s allowed
    0-6 = xoooooo
    2-4 = ooxoooo
    3-3 = oooxooo
    5 on combos
    0-0-5 = xxooooo
    0-2-3 = xooxooo
    0-3-2 = xoooxoo
    0-5-0 = xooooox
    2-0-3 = ooxxooo

    This assumes mirror images (eg. 4-2 vs 2-4, 3-0-2 vs 2-0-3) don't count. If included they add up to 15 but is not in the answers.
     
  5. sammy04

    sammy04 New Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    8
    its 16
    because the combinations go upto more than 12 lol.

    but i wouldnt waste ime on that question if its just 1 pointer, :)
     
  6. LMG!

    LMG! UTAS MBBS I Moderator

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    1,836
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Occupation:
    Clinical Psychologist
    I don't necessarily agree that statement one being FALSE means there are 0, 1, or 2 lights on. I'd interpret it as meaning more than two lights are on... how do you come to your conclusion, @A1? What am I interpreting incorrectly?
     
  7. LMG!

    LMG! UTAS MBBS I Moderator

    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    1,836
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Occupation:
    Clinical Psychologist
    All questions are worth more than one point. Just to clarify, do you mean if there weren't multiple questions based on the same stimulus?
     
    sammy04 likes this.
  8. sammy04

    sammy04 New Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    8
    yeah, !!! I mean if its just one question based on a big excerpt....
     
  9. A1

    A1 Certified Admissions Guru Moderator

    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    1,228
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Occupation:
    UWA MD minus-I
    More than 2 lights on can make but does not guarantee the statement false. Like 4 on + 3 off, the latter makes it true.
     
    LMG! likes this.
  10. tod

    tod New Member

    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    So this is the way I saw it.

    From Rule 1, we say that 0,1 or 2 lights are off.
    'Any OFF Light must not have exactly one adjacent ON light.'
    If we take this as xxxxxxx, we can already exclude the off lights from being on either end of the sequence as this would mean there is only 1 adjacent ON light if the on light was 2nd in the sequence.

    So you would be left with five possible places for the off lights.
    xxxxxxx
    x0xxxxx
    x0x0xxx
    x0xx0xx
    x0xxx0x
    xx0x0xx
    xx0xx0x
    xxx0x0x
    xx0xxxx
    xxx0xxx
    xxxx0xx
    xxxxx0x
    ....actually i just realised its a hec more than five :)

    Guess the answer was 12 C
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2017
  11. A1

    A1 Certified Admissions Guru Moderator

    Messages:
    1,884
    Likes Received:
    1,228
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Occupation:
    UWA MD minus-I
    Oops my interpretation above of the rule 2 was incorrect. Indeed it means an Off light must be between two On lights, and 12 is the answer.
     
  12. Kat92

    Kat92 Student (BDemCare, BBeSt). Hopeful for JMP 2020

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Occupation:
    Volunteer St John First Responder/ Health Student.
    I am thinking it could be 16 as I end up with 15 doing it both ways.
     
  13. Mana

    Mana Resident Medical Officer (UNDS MBBS) Administrar

    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    1,186
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Occupation:
    Resident Medical Officer
    Here's my attempt at it.

    So if you have two statements:

    1. More than 2 Lights are OFF - False (essentially, you have the statement that there are 0, 1, or 2 lights off)
    2. Any OFF Light must not have exactly one adjacent ON light

    for 0 lights off, there is 1 combination (all on)
    for 1 light off, there are exactly five combinations (the single off light being anywhere except either end)
    for 2 lights off, as per Rule 2, the off lights cannot be on either end and the off lights cannot be adjacent to each other. Basically this means in the middle 5 lights, you have (where 1 is an OFF light)
    lights 4 apart x 1 10001
    lights 3 apart x 2 10010 and 01001
    lights 2 apart x 3 10100 01010 00101

    This gives the requisite 12.
     
    JMP Lova likes this.

Share This Page