hahahahaxd
Member
Your score helps indicate VR 60% was more likely than 55%. With the 60% formula the lowest GWS with an invite is ...
Is there a likely chance we do get clairifcation on this at any point before next year?
Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules
What's NewIf you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us
Registered members with 100+ posts do not see Ads
Your score helps indicate VR 60% was more likely than 55%. With the 60% formula the lowest GWS with an invite is ...
Is there a likely chance we do get clairifcation on this at any point before next year?
Is it likely they used a different formula for top up offers, as i noticed people got top up invites with significantly lower scores, someone's total added up to 678.9 I believe?Your score helps indicate VR 60% was more likely than 55%. With the 60% formula the lowest GWS with an invite is
Is it likely they used a different formula for top up offers, as i noticed people got top up invites with significantly lower scores, someone's total added up to 678.9 I believe?
VR | DM | QR | AR | Total | %ile | Invite | Aggregate (to prove the % terms) | ||
670 | 820 | 780 | 870 | 3140 | 99 | Yes | 737.2 | ||
670 | 680 | 860 | 870 | 3080 | 98 | Yes | 730.0 | Prev lowest | |
700 | 690 | 860 | 770 | 3020 | 97 | Yes | 730.6 | ||
700 | 720 | 800 | 800 | 3020 | 97 | Yes | 732.4 | ||
720 | 780 | 830 | 680 | 3000 | 96 | Yes | 733.2 | ||
830 | 700 | 640 | 610 | 2780 | 86 | Yes | 752.0 | Lowest %ile | |
700 | 730 | 860 | 720 | 3010 | 97 | Top Up | 726.4 | New lowest | |
680 | 770 | 870 | 750 | 3070 | 98 | No | 726.2 | ||
680 | 680 | 830 | 800 | 2990 | 96 | No | 719.6 | ||
630 | 750 | 900 | 830 | 3110 | 98 | No | 712.8 | ||
720 | 810 | 730 | 670 | 2930 | 94 | No | 723.0 | ||
------------- | |||||||||
610 | 730 | 780 | 870 | 2990 | 96 | Yes-GWS | 691.6 | ||
630 | 700 | 860 | 770 | 2960 | 95 | Yes-GWS | 691.2 | Prev lowest | |
660 | 750 | 860 | 650 | 2920 | 94 | Yes-GWS | 693.0 | ||
720 | 700 | 700 | 620 | 2740 | 83 | Yes-GWS | 697.2 | Lowest %ile | |
640 | 720 | 740 | 800 | 2900 | 93 | Top Up-GWS | 690.4 | ||
640 | 790 | 760 | 710 | 2900 | 93 | Top Up-GWS | 685.0 | New lowest | |
590 | 700 | 830 | 870 | 2990 | 96 | No Inv-GWS | 682.4 |
Heyy A1, was just wondering what top-up means?I got four new sets of scores today, three fit in with the previous formula, the fourth required me to rework.
The weightings are now better presented in factors as VR + 0.2xDM + 0.2xQR + 0.3xAR
(equivalent to 58%VR + 12%DM + 12%QR + 18%AR in percentage terms).
The new lowest is 726.4 non-GWS, 685.0 GWS.
VR DM QR AR Total %ile Invite Aggregate 670 820 780 870 3140 99Yes 737.2 670 680 860 870 3080 98Yes 730.0Prev lowest 700 690 860 770 3020 97Yes 730.6 700 720 800 800 3020 97Yes 732.4 720 780 830 680 3000 96Yes 733.2 830 700 640 610 2780 86Yes 752.0Lowest %ile 700 730 860 720 3010 97Top Up 726.4New lowest 680 770 870 750 3070 98No 726.2 680 680 830 800 2990 96No 719.6 630 750 900 830 3110 98No 712.8 720 810 730 670 2930 94No 723.0------------- 610 730 780 870 2990 96Yes-GWS 691.6 630 700 860 770 2960 95Yes-GWS 691.2Prev lowest 660 750 860 650 2920 94Yes-GWS 693.0 720 700 700 620 2740 83Yes-GWS 697.2Lowest %ile 640 720 740 800 2900 93Top Up-GWS 690.4 640 790 760 710 2900 93Top Up-GWS 685.0New lowest 590 700 830 870 2990 96No Inv-GWS 682.4
Not A1 but a top-up, as the name suggests, is when a university/tertiary admissions centre contacts you to arrange an interview/place offer despite initially missing out. Let's say WSU invited 500 people to an interview, but 50 people couldn't make it and so declined their offers. Their interview circuits are now 50 people short, so they contact the next 50 people on the waiting list to ask them whether they would like still like to attend an interview. These are called top-upHeyy A1, was just wondering what top-up means?
I put my scores into the formula but it says I've gotten 1109?
Registered members with 100+ posts do not see Ads
Yep 652.6, even as GWS, definitely not making it in this year
Is there any known reason that WSU emphasizes so much on VR?I got four new sets of scores today, three fit in with the previous formula, the fourth required me to rework.
The weightings are now better presented in factors as VR + 0.2xDM + 0.2xQR + 0.3xAR
(equivalent to 58%VR + 12%DM + 12%QR + 18%AR in percentage terms).
The new lowest is 726.4 non-GWS, 685.0 GWS.
VR DM QR AR Total %ile Invite Aggregate 670 820 780 870 3140 99Yes 737.2 670 680 860 870 3080 98Yes 730.0Prev lowest 700 690 860 770 3020 97Yes 730.6 700 720 800 800 3020 97Yes 732.4 720 780 830 680 3000 96Yes 733.2 830 700 640 610 2780 86Yes 752.0Lowest %ile 700 730 860 720 3010 97Top Up 726.4New lowest 680 770 870 750 3070 98No 726.2 680 680 830 800 2990 96No 719.6 630 750 900 830 3110 98No 712.8 720 810 730 670 2930 94No 723.0------------- 610 730 780 870 2990 96Yes-GWS 691.6 630 700 860 770 2960 95Yes-GWS 691.2Prev lowest 660 750 860 650 2920 94Yes-GWS 693.0 720 700 700 620 2740 83Yes-GWS 697.2Lowest %ile 640 720 740 800 2900 93Top Up-GWS 690.4 640 790 760 710 2900 93Top Up-GWS 685.0New lowest 590 700 830 870 2990 96No Inv-GWS 682.4
Is there any known reason that WSU emphasizes so much on VR?
Yes, if you were a GWS studentI had gotten 688.8, would I even have had a chance based on last years statistics?
Damn, but it would've had to be from a top-up offer rather than initially right?Yes, if you were a GWS student
Yeah, if we take A1's weightings as gospel, you would not have made the initial 691 cutoff, but you would later receive a top-up invite. As for this year, anything can happen, such as:Damn, but it would've had to be from a top-up offer rather than initially right?
Thanks so much, one could only hope.Yeah, if we take A1's weightings as gospel, you would not have made the initial 691 cutoff, but you would later receive a top-up invite. As for this year, anything can happen, such as:
That said, fingers crossed everything turns out well for you
- UCAT scores shifting in either direction
- WSU changing up their weightings
Registered members with 100+ posts do not see Ads
WSU reveal very little information about their selection criteria. I don’t know how they came to decide on their UCAT weightings, but I can’t imagine a rationale for changing it up again until they’ve actually observed the cohorts they’ve admitted with said criteria and their performance in medical school - after this they’d be more inclined to make changes.Has anyone gotten any clues from e-mails, etc. as to whether (or how) the weightings will change this year?
Any speculation?
What trends from UMAT have you seen over the years?
Just kidding, I don't qualify for GWSI got a 720 in VR and I think i just qualify for GWS, my overall was 2930. Do I have a shot at an interview?
Registered members with 100+ posts do not see Ads