Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules
Quick Links To ForumsIf you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us
in an email from la trobe earlier they did use GPA/WAM. my uni only provides a GPA ...Are you sure? I thought LaTrobe published data previously and the offers were stating the minimum WAM of non-standards who obtained admission.
in an email from la trobe earlier they did use GPA/WAM. my uni only provides a GPA ...
My uni also only provides GPA. But I was always thinking under the assumption that they’ll just take each subjects and average out the results instead of looking at the letter grade.in an email from la trobe earlier they did use GPA/WAM. my uni only provides a GPA ...
Checked with Latrobe, they will convert your gpa to wam, not sure how? But a gpa 7 is not guaranteed for an offer since 80 and 90 out of 100 are both hd or 7i dont think so, it would be whatever your uni provides.
My uni converts it differently (HD is 85-100) so I'm not too sure how this would work outChecked with Latrobe, they will convert your gpa to wam, not sure how? But a gpa 7 is not guaranteed for an offer since 80 and 90 out of 100 are both hd or 7
this makes no sense from la trobe, how is it possible to convert a GPA to a WAMChecked with Latrobe, they will convert your gpa to wam, not sure how? But a gpa 7 is not guaranteed for an offer since 80 and 90 out of 100 are both hd or 7
not sure, thats what they replied back to me. vtac can get ur transcripts from ur uni directly, maybe there are more details there.this makes no sense from la trobe, how is it possible to convert a GPA to a WAM
Afaik UQ (& possibly Curtin) only provides the letter grades, no subject marks.My uni also only provides GPA. But I was always thinking under the assumption that they’ll just take each subjects and average out the results instead of looking at the letter grade.
Can you elaborate?Afaik UQ (& possibly Curtin) only provides the letter grades, no subject marks.
If your uni transcript provides the subject marks it's primary-school maths to calculate WAM, no GPA-WAM conversion is needed.
Previously, Latrobe used to have two different pathways for internal applicants and external applicants.Are you sure? I thought LaTrobe published data previously and the offers were stating the minimum WAM of non-standards who obtained admission.
I agree. They used to have 3-4 internal applicants and 1-2 external applicants admitted to the course every year. Unless they have decided to shift the domographics of the new cohort to predominantly non-standards, I don't see how they can make an offer to every external applicant who has a GPA 7/7. Last year there were like 1200+ applicants for 24 metro places.But a gpa 7 is not guaranteed for an offer since 80 and 90 out of 100 are both hd or 7
See for example the UAdel transcript below.Can you elaborate?
Are you saying that they just assign 80 to each subject? or 100?
![[MedStudentsOnline.com.au] La Trobe Dentistry: General Discussion [MedStudentsOnline.com.au] La Trobe Dentistry: General Discussion](https://data.medstudentsonline.com.au/attachments/4/4982-71228e4a6a2f178f0b28486369adbf6d.jpg?hash=R_hhwzVcmU)
I think that's for gaining additional subject adjustment factors! It says:What are the prerequisites for this course, it only says English? But people here are saying you have to do Bio as well?
That's what I was thinking, but idk why people in the thread are saying you have to have bio and chem, maybe they removed it?I think that's for gaining additional subject adjustment factors! It says:
VCE:
A study score of 30 in Biology or Chemistry equals 2 aggregate points per study. Overall maximum of 4 points.
HSC:
Applicants who successfully complete one of the following HSC or equivalent Year 12 subjects will have their selection rank increased by one point per study:
A study score of 30 in Biology or Chemistry equals 2 aggregate points per study. Overall maximum of 4 points.
They changed it this year. Bio and chem used to be compulosry. But considering that they give 2 points for each subject and offers are made solely based on ATAR, most applicants would not be competitive without Bio and Chem.That's what I was thinking, but idk why people in the thread are saying you have to have bio and chem, maybe they removed it?
I don't think so, you still need a 99.85 to get bumped up to a 99.95 using that aggregate adjustmentThey changed it this year. Bio and chem used to be compulosry. But considering that they give 2 points for each subject and offers are made solely based on ATAR, most applicants would not be competitive without Bio and Chem.
Tbh, I don't know how they'll rank applicants this year because 4 aggregate points would bump most applicants' ATAR to 99.95.
Is 4 aggregate points not just 4 points added to your ATAR? e.g. 95 -> 99? (edit: Also, is there a limit to how much aggregate points you could get? I got 15 (19 if you add the subject ones), but I'm not sure if that would be all countedI don't think so, you still need a 99.85 to get bumped up to a 99.95 using that aggregate adjustment
From their website:Is 4 aggregate points not just 4 points added to your ATAR? e.g. 95 -> 99? (edit: Also, is there a limit to how much aggregate points you could get? I got 15 (19 if you add the subject ones), but I'm not sure if that would be all counted
Thank you!!From their website:
Adjustment factors are additional factors we consider in applications. Adjustment factors (previously bonus points) may be added to an applicant’s raw aggregate score, which will result in the re-ranking of an applicants’ ATAR. Adjustment factors do not add points directly to the ATAR.
Some examples of adjustment factors include performance in specific subjects (subject adjustments), equity and personal factors (SEAS) and La Trobe access schemes. If you are eligible for multiple adjustments, the maximum aggregate adjustments you can receive is 20. However, some of our courses may have specific rules associated with adjustment factors.
You're correct. It is aggregate points. I confused it with UQ's adjustment factors.I don't think so, you still need a 99.85 to get bumped up to a 99.95 using that aggregate adjustment