Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules
Quick Links To ForumsIf you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us
Hi, could someone please help me because I keep on getting confused with these 'either' questions!!
View attachment 4699Heyar, basically the question is asking that a potato is round or it a fruit. We know the potato does not have seed.We are not given any other information of what the potato can be.We can’t assume that it’s a fruit accordingto the second statement. Also it’s not necessary that it’s round since wearen’t given any other information.
Hey here is a screenshot of the terminology from the official UCAT website. Reading this helped me a lot with the DM questionsHi, could someone please help me because I keep on getting confused with these 'either' questions!!
View attachment 4699
![[MedStudentsOnline.com.au] UCAT: Decision Making [MedStudentsOnline.com.au] UCAT: Decision Making](https://data.medstudentsonline.com.au/attachments/4/4166-c41fd2e651d512cc99e6658f01ef65ad.jpg?hash=uJPhLPU8T0)
Careful, I warned earlier in one of my comments that UCAT in their banks directly contradicts their definitions. I'm more inclined to say the question banks are correct, however.Hey here is a screenshot of the terminology from the official UCAT website. Reading this helped me a lot with the DM questions
View attachment 4705
'Either' means to satisfy either condition. Clearly, there isn't enough information for us to conclude if it is round or if it is a fruit.Hi, could someone please help me because I keep on getting confused with these 'either' questions!!
View attachment 4699
Ah yes, regarding the 'substandard product', I clarified and this is their response:Careful, I warned earlier in one of my comments that UCAT in their banks directly contradicts their definitions. I'm more inclined to say the question banks are correct, however.
'Either' means to satisfy either condition. Clearly, there isn't enough information for us to conclude if it is round or if it is a fruit.
![[MedStudentsOnline.com.au] UCAT: Decision Making [MedStudentsOnline.com.au] UCAT: Decision Making](https://data.medstudentsonline.com.au/attachments/4/4172-bdb5c3961ae30a00e7d9bc267e2d0495.jpg?hash=HN-LdM-6Cd)
Interesting to say the least. They already did review their question banks and update them so I'm surprised this wasn't amended already....Ah yes, regarding the 'substandard product', I clarified and this is their response:
View attachment 4711
I think what they meant by updating was that they added new questions only. I sat the UCAT last year, and this was the exact same question bank minus the new questions. They updated the definitions, but didn't review and align it with the question bankInteresting to say the least. They already did review their question banks and update them so I'm surprised this wasn't amended already....
Did they ever update their definitions? Was this confirmed?I think what they meant by updating was that they added new questions only. I sat the UCAT last year, and this was the exact same question bank minus the new questions. They updated the definitions, but didn't review and align it with the question bank
The definitions only came out this year so it's the most updated version.Did they ever update their definitions? Was this confirmed?
Because of the keyword 'can'. 'Can' implies a possibility, so the statement is asking if it is possible. It's not saying that it's 100% true but it's asking if it is possible. Since there is no evidence against this in the premise, we conclude 'YES' it is possible.Does anyone understand when to say yes or no when information is inadequate. Whats the difference between a statement following and not. View attachment 4715
How can statement two be concluded without further information? The passage doesn't contradict it, but it doesn't affirm it either.
Makes more sense. If they substituted the word can for 'are', would the answer then be NO in your opinion?Because of the keyword 'can'. 'Can' implies a possibility, so the statement is asking if it is possible. It's not saying that it's 100% true but it's asking if it is possible. Since there is no evidence against this in the premise, we conclude 'YES' it is possible.
Yep, because we cannot conclude that. “Are” implies a statement.Makes more sense. If they substituted the word can for 'are', would the answer then be NO in your opinion?
I believe you may be correct.hello ! can someone shed some light on question A because the premise only provides one example (of a mansion in this case) , so we cannot deduce that some were former installations (as it needs to be more than one) ?
View attachment 4719
I have encountered the same question before and I agree with you. According to UCAT ANZ definition, 'some > 1'hello ! can someone shed some light on question A because the premise only provides one example (of a mansion in this case) , so we cannot deduce that some were former installations (as it needs to be more than one) ?
View attachment 4719
1<some<allI have encountered the same question before and I agree with you. According to UCAT ANZ definition, 'some > 1'
My bad! Thanks for the correction1<some<all
I agree the answer in this particular case should be No we cannot deduce, but not because the word Some is >1. It's because of the plural mansions i.e. we cannot deduce from one mansion to plural mansions.hello ! can someone shed some light on question A because the premise only provides one example (of a mansion in this case) , so we cannot deduce that some were former installations (as it needs to be more than one) ?