• Welcome to MSO!
    We are an online community for current and prospective medical, dental and allied health students and early career professionals from Australia and New Zealand.

    Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules

    Quick Links To Forums
    Tests/Interviews: UCAT | GAMSAT | Interviews
    Entrance Discussion: Graduate Medicine | Undergraduate Medicine | Dentistry
  • Register with us

    Please consider registering on MSO. Benefits of registering are:
    • Able to post and participate in the forum
    • After 10 posts: Private Message Other Users
    • After 25 posts: Access to the Chatbox
    • After 100 posts: Custom user titles and Ad-free experience

    If you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us

Otago HSFY chat - archive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Distribution of cardiac output at rest - NOT 5L/min, it was "none of the above"
Thinnest layer of vein wall - intima
 
I thought distribution of cardiac output was "affected by arterial compliance"? Because during one of our lectures we had that exact question for a quiz and the answer was "arterial resistance"

With the diaphragm question, I thought it was it being inferior to the lungs as the question says something along the lines of "which one affects inspiration", and it's the diaphragm being below the lungs that creates the pressure gradient

Koochkooch and Pete, I'd be keen to join in for the epi meet-up, I can make it monday after 10 and tuesday before 3. Wednesday and thursday are a bit scattered but I can make it if the time's right
 
skyglow you must be very smart!!!! how can you remember what you had last year?
my results were not bad had 98 GPA for first semester..... but to be honest i dont even remember a single question from my previous tests or exam....bravo u hav a sharp mind...
 
Well he explicitly said "the distribution of cardiac output at rest is NOT 5L/min" and we had the quiz question too in the lecture to reinforce that point. And when you guys talk about the same question as we had it reminds me about last year's question.
 
12-3 is when I have stuff on wednesday (lol worst time picking ever) and at night I have to give a tutorial at aquinas.
 
95 i health sci and 80 in UMAT. 67% contributes from GPA, 33% from UMAT
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh so if Health sci is 67%, then each semester must be worth around as much as umat?

So if we talk about ONE semester's worth of grades, would a 95 in semester 1 of health sci or a 95 in umat be more valuble?

And one more little thing, we know there's no difference between 90 and 100, it's just A+ and you get your points, does the same go for umat? Thanks
 
Papers are GPA based and umat is percentile based so I would think theres a difference between each 1% for umat instead of every 5% for a paper.

And theoretically if you compared a 95 for 1 semester and a 95 for umat it should be the same?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top