Perhaps they can be said to be a cohort that had more steam than usual at the beginning, and faded into ordinarity?![]()
[offtopic]You might be more right than you think there. While there were some exceptions (e.g. CHEM terms test, and some unusually good marks in HEAL), and while everyone loses steam in S2, I think there's reasonable evidence that that cohort underperformed in S2, especially relative to S1.[/offtopic]