PimpOfRivia
Member
1. 9 (unsure of this one though)
2. Just I
3. 4
Yeah there was a pattern..[X,X-Y,Y] idk if it was correct but it worked for all of the scenarios
Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules
Quick Links To ForumsIf you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us
1. 9 (unsure of this one though)
2. Just I
3. 4
i put 4750, my interpretation was because air bubbles form after a certain amount of snow falls, therefore the air bubbles can never be older than the snow, because air bubbles only form when the snow reaches and x amount of depth. Air bubbles can’t form before the snow and therefore can never be older? That’s what I thought.I might be crazy here, but I picked the 5250 answer for the snow air bubbles question. My reasoning was my interpretation of the text that an air bubble forms when the snow becomes compact, thus networks of air get closed off, which I assume(d?) leads to the air in the compact snow pushing up to the non compactef snow.
Hence, I picked the answer where the air bubble is either the same age or older than the surrounding snow, but never younger.
Did I just absolutely flop on this question or does my interpretation make any sense?
I swear Acer made a mistake on this question. I thought the exact same as you and analysed it for WAY too long.
ETA: I interpreted it as Away could be 2A, but the last question in this stem meant that you didn't know whether it was home or away in position 2 iirc.
Anyone remember the specfics of the question?
Something about 20cm? 5000 years?
BEYONCÉ IS HAVING TWINS!!
Now that I’ve got your attention, I’d like to redirection your focus to an important issue. It’s about the kendrick Lamar concert (or whatever the hell that screaming and loud banging sounds were) going on during the umat EXACTLY when I started doing s1 and s2
Had to re read so much shit
Sydney pm session
BEYONCÉ IS HAVING TWINS!!
Now that I’ve got your attention, I’d like to redirection your focus to an important issue. It’s about the kendrick Lamar concert (or whatever the hell that screaming and loud banging sounds were) going on during the umat EXACTLY when I started doing s1 and s2
Had to re read so much shit
Sydney pm session
Tbh I feel like one of the reasons for this could be because in recent years it has been "easier" to "study" for the UMAT. There are so many materials and resources based on UMAT questions, and the majority of people taking the test tend to "study". To combat this, the questions have to be somewhat difficult and abstract or else like you said, we'd all blindly get 100%ilesLmao has anyone ever seen umat practice exams from like ten years ago...... boyyy we all could get 100th percentile doing it blind.
Rest in peace anyone doing UMAT in 2028. It only gets worse each year
Tbh I feel like one of the reasons for this could be because in recent years it has been "easier" to "study" for the UMAT. There are so many materials and resources based on UMAT questions, and the majority of people taking the test tend to "study". To combat this, the questions have to be somewhat difficult and abstract or else like you said, we'd all blindly get 100%iles
Lmao has anyone ever seen umat practice exams from like ten years ago...... boyyy we all could get 100th percentile doing it blind.
Rest in peace anyone doing UMAT in 2028. It only gets worse each year
Well I didn't mean percentile percentile, was just trying to make an exaggerated point about getting really high lolThat's not how a percentile works...
A good set of earplugs can help a lot too.
I mentioned this before but I think it got buried. Did anyone else find that they had already read some of the section 2 passages before? In particular the one about two new dads.
Anyone remember the specfics of the question?
Something about 20cm? 5000 years?