• Welcome to MSO!
    We are an online community for current and prospective medical, dental and allied health students and early career professionals from Australia and New Zealand.

    Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules

    Quick Links To Forums
    Tests/Interviews: UCAT | GAMSAT | Interviews
    Entrance Discussion: Graduate Medicine | Undergraduate Medicine | Dentistry
  • Register with us

    Please consider registering on MSO. Benefits of registering are:
    • Able to post and participate in the forum
    • After 10 posts: Private Message Other Users
    • After 25 posts: Access to the Chatbox
    • After 100 posts: Custom user titles and Ad-free experience

    If you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us

Rural Eligibility and General Discussion

?Wdym? If you pref the other two above you run the risk of getting Armidale/Orange, and never getting to hear from UNSW.

That goes back to the original point. If i put myself in a rural student's shoes, who might have done well in UCAT/ATAR, and decide to pref JMP and JMP above UNSW, then there is a chance the interviews are just good enough to land a spot in Campbelltown or Newcastle.....but it could be Armidale or Orange (because again theres no guarantee or numerical value that a person has for their interviews). So, if you're gonna be relatively more likely to get a Kensington CSP, why would you risk getting Armidale/Orange without even getting to hear about UNSW?

Personally, think the 1 year trade off for a likely Kensington is better than having to live in Armidale/Orange. And i guess its a sentiment shared by a fair few rural students, i remember somewhere on MSO i saw a lil sample the JCU ran with their graduates, more often than not, rural students just tended to go to a major city anyway, so extrapolating that tendency you can see why UNSW would get pref'd above JMP/JPM a lot more, doesnt matter if they are rural or local.
Rural entry students will be expected to do phase 2+3 in Port/Wagga so its not like their whole degree will be in Kensington but that was not what I was saying. I was more saying if a member wished to go to the JMP/JPM OVER UNSW there is no harm in prefrencing them higher.
 
Rural entry students will be expected to do phase 2+3 in Port/Wagga so its not like their whole degree will be in Kensington but that was not what I was saying. I was more saying if a member wished to go to the JMP/JPM OVER UNSW there is no harm in prefrencing them higher.
Oh yeah in that case sure. Main point of discussion was 'Why would most rural have UNSW first round... Its a six year course compared with a five year course...". Those myriad of reasons above is why. Rurals are made to to phase 2 AND/OR phase 3 in rural locations. And sure, best case scenario for most rurals is 4 years kensington (Both Phase 1 and 2 there) and 2 years of phase 3 in one of Albury-Wodonga, Coffs Harbour, Griffith, Port Macquarie and Wagga Wagga, (idk about you but 2 years in those places > 5 years in Armidale/Orange).
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah in that case sure. Main point of discussion was 'Why would most rural have UNSW first round... Its a six year course compared with a five year course...". Those myriad of reasons above is why. Rurals are made to to phase 2 AND/OR phase 3 in rural locations. And sure, best case scenario for most rurals is 4 years kensington (Both Phase 1 and 2 there) and 2 years of phase 3 in one of Albury-Wodonga, Coffs Harbour, Griffith, Port Macquarie and Wagga Wagga, (idk about you but 2 years in those places > 5 years in Armidale/Orange).
Although with this said, if you wanna go to JMP or WSU, just put it up. I feel like there is a bit too much overthinking going on with prefs. They are meant to be pref's for a reason, so put down where you wanna go most first and just go on from there. Its gonna be very rare for one person to qualify for multitudes of places anyway so it the vast majority of cases it doesnt even matter.

Just to clear up too, im just playing devils advocate here Nonstandard983 , I've personally decided that Newy might be my best bet, mainly because my GF's family's moving there + a fair few high school friends have gotten offers there too so, i guess theres another reason as to why someone might pick a different uni hahah.
 
Last edited:
Although with this said, if you wanna go to JMP or WSU, just put it up. I feel like there is a bit too much overthinking going on with prefs. They are meant to be pref's for a reason, so put down where you wanna go most first and just go on from there. Its gonna be very rare for one person to qualify for multitudes of places anyway so it the vast majority of cases it doesnt even matter.

Just to clear up too, im just playing devils advocate here Nonstandard983 , I've personally decided that Newy might be my best bet, mainly because my GF's family's moving there + a fair few high school friends have gotten offers there too so, i guess theres another reason as to why someone might pick a different uni hahah.
And the fact that the course is 5 years rather than 6 😉
 
itll more be like 1 in 3, because some rural people may not reach the atar hurdle and also they might get offers at UNSW or WSU and preference that over JMP.
Am I right in saying the non-rural interview to offer ratio may also be slightly more than 1/3 for the same reason that people may get offers to UNSW/WSU or not reaching the academic cut-off?
 
Am I right in saying the non-rural interview to offer ratio may also be slightly more than 1/3 for the same reason that people may get offers to UNSW/WSU or not reaching the academic cut-off?
Im not 100% sure, because i feel that if people reach the high cutoffs for non rural (93%ile for JMP and really high VR for WSU) id say there more likely to reach the academic hurdle than rural kids.
 
itll more be like 1 in 3, because some rural people may not reach the atar hurdle and also they might get offers at UNSW or WSU and preference that over JMP.
A1 did the math and if you are rural I think they hypothesised that with 3 interview invites (UNSW/WSU/JMP) you should have around a 1/2 chance of an offer anywhere due to double ups.
 
A1 did the math and if you are rural I think they hypothesised that with 3 interview invites (UNSW/WSU/JMP) you should have around a 1/2 chance of an offer anywhere due to double ups.
oh sheeesh thats pog, i should have 7 invites but i dont have WSU does that mean that i will still have 1/2 chance or will it be higher? Has anyone done the maths for more than 3 invites?
 
oh sheeesh thats pog, i should have 7 invites but i dont have WSU does that mean that i will still have 1/2 chance or will it be higher? Has anyone done the maths for more than 3 invites?
If you have UQ amongst your 7 I would assume so. This is because UQ over offered quite a bit to compensate for interstate rejections which should apply even more for rural students.
 
If you have UQ amongst your 7 I would assume so. This is because UQ over offered quite a bit to compensate for interstate rejections which should apply even more for rural students.
I dont have UQ which is unfortunate because im a gap year applicant
 
oh sheeesh thats pog, i should have 7 invites but i dont have WSU does that mean that i will still have 1/2 chance or will it be higher? Has anyone done the maths for more than 3 invites?
Yes and no, your chances go up the more interviews you get for sure but not by the same amount as if all those schools were in the same state/territory or more importantly if the schools in the same state have the same selection criteria. However with 7 interview invites I would say you'd have a pretty good chance likely higher than 1/2. Its also dependant on other factors so for example when it comes to UNSW if a rural student had a UCAT 90%ile+ a ATAR equiv 97.5+ and a rurality above RRMA 4 they likely would have a 80% chance of securing a place i.e. they would only need to score better than 20% of applicants due too how UNSW weights sections for an offer.

Furthermore if all medical schools in NSW had the same selection criteria qualifying for an interview would give you well over 50% chance at an offer probably closer to 80% without actually doing the math. Thats why the selection criteria differs from school to school so they minimise the amount of duplicate offers however due to the size of the rural applicant pool this often doesn't work as well as it does with the standard applicant pool hence the 1/2 chance.
 
Yes and no, your chances go up the more interviews you get for sure but not by the same amount as if all those schools were in the same state/territory or more importantly if the schools in the same state have the same selection criteria. However with 7 interview invites I would say you'd have a pretty good chance likely higher than 1/2. Its also dependant on other factors so for example when it comes to UNSW if a rural student had a UCAT 90%ile+ a ATAR equiv 97.5+ and a rurality above RRMA 4 they likely would have a 80% chance of securing a place i.e. they would only need to score better than 20% of applicants due too how UNSW weights sections for an offer.

Furthermore if all medical schools in NSW had the same selection criteria qualifying for an interview would give you well over 50% chance at an offer probably closer to 80% without actually doing the math.
Wow thats so good, hopefully thats teh case
 
itll more be like 1 in 3, because some rural people may not reach the atar hurdle and also they might get offers at UNSW or WSU and preference that over JMP.
There would be very few who dont make the atar hurdle, its ≈91.5 (UNSW - 91, JMP - 91.4, WSU - 91.5) for rural candidates. I dont think itd be incorrect to assume that a significant majority of rurals would be achieving well above this. Of the 500 or so total applicants, I'd estimate ≈100 (max) to not make this cut off, so in that case, itd prolly be less 1/3 and more 1/4, which is about the same as locals.
 
There would be very few who dont make the atar hurdle, its ≈91.5 (UNSW - 91, JMP - 91.4, WSU - 91.5) for rural candidates. I dont think itd be incorrect to assume that a significant majority of rurals would be achieving well above this. Of the 500 or so total applicants, I'd estimate ≈100 (max) to not make this cut off, so in that case, itd prolly be less 1/3 and more 1/4, which is about the same as locals.
Yea that’s fair enough, what I meant was, that not meeting the atar hurdle combined with people preferecning unsw and Jpm above would make it 1 in 3.
 
More than the hurdle, I thought it would be the duplication of offers (there was a lot of discussion on this last week) for rural apps. For example, many of the people that end up with offers at UNSW and JPM probably got interviews at JMP. This duplication factor probably also applies to interstate, but to a lesser extent. I know a number of interstate rural friends that got like 4-5 interviews including JMP where they are hoping to stay in their state.
 
I do agree. Think it theoretically evens out to about 1:3 due to preferencing and also due to many people getting multiple offers
 
More than the hurdle, I thought it would be the duplication of offers (there was a lot of discussion on this last week) for rural apps. For example, many of the people that end up with offers at UNSW and JPM probably got interviews at JMP. This duplication factor probably also applies to interstate, but to a lesser extent. I know a number of interstate rural friends that got like 4-5 interviews including JMP where they are hoping to stay in their state.
this is the primary reason
There would be very few who dont make the atar hurdle, its ≈91.5 (UNSW - 91, JMP - 91.4, WSU - 91.5) for rural candidates. I dont think itd be incorrect to assume that a significant majority of rurals would be achieving well above this. Of the 500 or so total applicants, I'd estimate ≈100 (max) to not make this cut off, so in that case, itd prolly be less 1/3 and more 1/4, which is about the same as locals.
rather than this... although do remember MSO is full of high achievers and a 91 ATAR is still a high achieving student in the scheme of things (they have to be in the top 10% of their cohort?) and anyone who achieves this should be proud, I do agree though I only see it eliminating approximately 100 from the pool.
 
More than the hurdle, I thought it would be the duplication of offers (there was a lot of discussion on this last week) for rural apps. For example, many of the people that end up with offers at UNSW and JPM probably got interviews at JMP. This duplication factor probably also applies to interstate, but to a lesser extent. I know a number of interstate rural friends that got like 4-5 interviews including JMP where they are hoping to stay in their state.
I guess for rurals its more so how many interstates are applying to your home state. I think the breakdown of the rural spots is like ≈120 NSW, ≈70 Vic, ≈40 SA, and ≈50 Qld. In this breakdown i feel like there is obviously a bias for students to want to study in their home states, which obviously makes sense, why would someone in SA choose a UNSW offer over a UAdel offer? (I'm sure some do, but its so few that we can kinda rule them out anyway). But with that said, i feel like a lot of Qld students prefer coming down to NSW (maybe this hypothesis is wrong, but the overwhelming majority on MSO from QLD seem to want to).

If we just throw out some numbers, with the assumption that most students would prefer a place in their states, of the 180 or so applicants who interview at UNSW lets say, that could be broken down to ≈50 from vic, 70 NSW, 30 Qld, and 20 SA and maybe like 10 WA. (again, these arent actual stats, or meant to be accurate representations, but just used to illustrate my point).

Of these, a significant portion of 'best'/'highest ranked' Vic students are going to get Monash offers (because it prefs their states' students, and so cutting the best 40 rural Vic students out from the pot, who im assuming want to go to monash over unsw, and itd be kinda silly not to imo). Similarly, a fair few of the best S/A rurals will get Adelaide (Cutting out the top 15 SA students). So i guess in this case for a NSW rural looking for UNSW, its more so they are now competing against a fair few less than those 180 people being interviewed.. just from that above, it becomes more so competing against 125. Idk if this was expressed too well but it makes sense to me lol
 
Yeah I totally understand you. Makes much more sense and I didn't think of it like that !
 
Back
Top