Thanks for this info, it's a big help to guide me to an understanding of what going on.I read a few years back an article published by some of the medicine academics about their entry criteria and how they have moved to a non-compensatory method of selecting applicants. Let me see if I can find said article.
edit: here it is - Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach
With the compensatory method (CM) in earlier years
- Each applicant gets an ATAR rank and a UCAT rank (ranked against the applicants pool)
- These two ranks are combined/averaged into an effective rank
(Example ATAR ranked 700th + UCAT ranked 20th gives Effective rank 360th)
- The effective rank is used to select the top say 450 for interview.
But now with the non-compensatory method (NCM)
- The same, each applicant gets an ATAR rank and a UCAT rank
- They are then ranked on the *lowest* of their two ranks
- If there aren't many high ATAR with low UCAT (to be excluded by UCAT) the exampled applicant above would be ranked outside of 450th to get an interview.
....
However that is for interview selection. It's hard to visualise how NCM can have been applied to place offers, because
- If lowest rank were applied as above, 150 places out of 450 interviewees means all of lowly-ranked 99.5-99.6s would be rejected. But we have seen 99.5-99.6s got place offers.
The puzzling thing is in recent years med schools make an effort to lessen the advantages well-off families can afford to gain, namely very high ATARs. UNSW's action results in you either have 99.50+ or you need EAS/Gateway, the regular schools' 99.0 to 99.45 are now shut out. (Whereas in earlier years they had a chance to balance up with a high UCAT).