Good point! This would mean swathes of people on the same selection rank (surely only, say, 99.00, 98.00 and maybe 97.00 would be all that competitive?), and the more differentiated parts of the selection equation being UCAT and (depending on how it's scored) interview?If 99.95 & 99.00 are both equated to Rank 99.0, wouldn't 98.95 be equated to Rank 98.0 thus a full 1.0 rank below a 99.0?
I'm not sure what I think about this.. If something is 'worth' two rank adjustments, and you're differentiating people down to the .xx, then it wouldn't seem right to cap achievement potential. It's like saying, "even if we took away all your financial disadvantage/gave you an inner city family and an inner city education, we don't think you'd be able to achieve more than 99.00, so we're capping it at that..." Makes a bit of a mockery of having the adjustment program in the first place.Otoh UQ could be tricky in that everyone will retain their ATAR decimals for competitiveness, except 99.0 is the ceiling for boosted ATARs. For example 96.6+2= 98.6, 97.6+2= 99.0, 99.6 remains 99.6 whether +2 or not (so retains their edge over low 99s)?