Plus misconceptions of the BHSc and negative perceptions of it deter people from choosing it over BSc
Interesting, are you able to elaborate?
Word of advice, I have found the BHSc pretty challenging as the concepts of Population health are relatively new to me and this course is heavily based on population health. It a much more 'wordy' course than BSc Biomed in my opinion.
The POPHLTH courses which are (from my understanding) [all] essay based would be a big change, it takes skill and experience to craft a decent piece of accademik ryeting but in saying that, science is more factual and black and white than an essay; if you don't know what an s3 orbital is or the difference between glycogenolysis and gluconeogensis then its not like you can just pull some crap out your arse and spew it down onto paper and maybe get a C for it like you can in some of the non science based stuff
With that said, its a nice change from having to slog through 3 years of stuff like organic chemistry for the pharmacology major of biomed
CHEM110 scares me ... a lot, BIOSCI107 looks fairly easy (basic cellular biology and excitable tissue shouldn't be that hard, covered a lot of that stuff in Normal Body Function and Cardiology papers), MEDSCI142 I am unsure about but it's middle of the road and POPHLTH111 eh we'll see
The nice thing about the BSc (Biomed) is it's all based in City and Grafton (except for POPHLTH 111) so no trekking out to bloody Tamaki for the other pop health papers!

(y)
So quick (plus they manually marked our MCQ scripts...).