So there is some merit in thinking that unis can artificially raise the requirements for interstate interviewees by purposefully reducing the number the available spots for them, thereby favouring local applicants? Therefore, the conjecture that unis just look at previous records and set aside interstate places accordingly to ensure that the cutoffs are the same isn't necessarily true. Wouldn't this mean that unis that hold separate rounds for interviews for local/interstate applicants have the power favour local applicants? Not necessarily all of them do - but they can.More interesting stats..... for folks applying to Monash.
I have verified from Med Deans data Monash school-leaver intakes have been steady around 240 a year. From VTAC reports like this > (Application Statistics 2018/19 - Undergraduate - VTAC) these were the numbers of offers Monash made in the first round to local & rural applicants
2014 intake: 179 - 2015: 177 - 2016: 197 - 2017: 219 - 2018: 215 - 2019: 219
Basically in 2014/2015 Monash set aside 60+ places for the ~100 interstate interviewees. Now only 21 !!
This also confirms what I mentioned earlier. Of the ~100 interstate invited to interview quite a few didn't attend since they already got a home state offer, thus practically anyone who bothered to turn up got an offer.