S
sunnyrain
Guest
Ahh okay, thank you Crow!
Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules
Quick Links To ForumsIf you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us
Bond 2020 May intake 131
Bond 2020 Sep intake 60
Do you happen to know the typical May intake figure?
MedDeans show Bond's last four years Y1 enrolments were 124 - 128 - 134 - 131 (2020).
And Bond is taking another 60 on top of this 131?![]()
Yeah, that’s what I was wondering!! Yikes!! What on earth??! I was thinking (hoping!!) the May intake had dropped substantially.
I thought students were able to defer start dates. These figures if added together seem incorrect.Do you happen to know the typical May intake figure?
Maybe Bond sent to MedDeans the 2020 *initial* number of Y1 enrolments. But since then 60 have withdrawn due to COVID restrictions?
In 2020, Bond offered 130 places into the Medical Program^ with 80% of total places for undergraduate applicants and 20% of total places to graduate applicants
when does applications even open for bond MD?
I thought students were able to defer start dates. These figures if added together seem incorrect.
Can confirm Bond took in another 60 additional students, although I find the justification perplexing.
Bond has foreseen a COVID-induced need for 60 extra QLD doctors in 5-7 years time. They are saying this pandemic will still be passing around then?
Btw AMC's relation with med schools is only on accreditation of the courses. Bond would have needed to show AMC they can organise the increased clinical placements for approval accreditation-wise. AMC's blessing is not relevant to the increase in graduates output itself.
Agreed, its a false pretense to increase $$$. They could run a cohort as large or small as they like assuming the AMC thinks the quality of teach is still acceptable.
Yeah they mentioned in the letter of offer the thing about "increasing the supply of medical practitioners" in addition to allowing the May-intake students some flexibility to defer if their financial security has been impacted by the pandemic. I agree that the "increasing the supply of medical practitioners" sounds like a rather weak attempt to find a non-monetary justification for the additional intake, that said, I find the "allowing May-intake students some flexibility to defer" reasoning fair enough. Also Bond University did a universal 25% fee reduction for all students in all years in all faculties last semester, and a 15% reduction this semester, they gotta make up for it somehow to still be able to run the university.Agreed, its a false pretense to increase $$$. They could run a cohort as large or small as they like assuming the AMC thinks the quality of teach is still acceptable.
Honestly, medicine entry is incredibly competitive and you should take what you can get where you can if you are in the financial position to do it. It's not a good move at all but you may as well capitalise on it. Internships are allocated on a random ballot basis and the uni you graduate from won't have any bearing on your career once you've graduated.Does all this have any bearing on the legitimacy of the qualification and/or internship placements later on? 'cause I'm in this September cohort and I've been a bit insecure about that. I made a post a while back in the Non-standard entry thread with something to this effect, but TL;DR I was planning to attempt non-standard entry into medicine elsewhere, I re-sat the UCAT and everything, and then suddenly I received the September offer. Logically, I accepted it because I felt the guaranteed offer here (expensive & unconventional as it may be) was still better than risking no offer elsewhere. But it feels like such a 'dodgy' way of scraping my way into medicine, at times I've worried whether or not it might plague me for the rest of my career (by internship risk, reputation, or otherwise).
They definitely won't be struggling to run the university on the back of a single trimester of a small fee cut. They have been charging absolutely exorbitant fees since the uni's inception. Especially not justifiable if it comes with a dilution of student learning experiences.they gotta make up for it somehow to still be able to run the university.