On the obesity s1 question:
how can u deem research unworthy if it doesn’t include data on other aspects which previous research includes?
Imagine there’s 2 research papers on the comparison of lifespan (can’t think of an appropriate word but hear me out on the point I’m making haha) of 3 types of teeth (incisors, canines and molars) to premolars.
And then there’s a third research paper on the comparison of lifespan of only molars to premolars.
Are u going to say that the third research paper is useless? That it has nothing in it that can be compared to the previous two research papers? Of course there is. You can use the data in all 3 papers to compare lifespan of molars to premolars. it’s just that one research paper was more focussed and the other two were broader.
how can u deem research unworthy if it doesn’t include data on other aspects which previous research includes?
Imagine there’s 2 research papers on the comparison of lifespan (can’t think of an appropriate word but hear me out on the point I’m making haha) of 3 types of teeth (incisors, canines and molars) to premolars.
And then there’s a third research paper on the comparison of lifespan of only molars to premolars.
Are u going to say that the third research paper is useless? That it has nothing in it that can be compared to the previous two research papers? Of course there is. You can use the data in all 3 papers to compare lifespan of molars to premolars. it’s just that one research paper was more focussed and the other two were broader.
