• Welcome to MSO!
    We are an online community for current and prospective medical, dental and allied health students and early career professionals from Australia and New Zealand.

    Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules

    Quick Links To Forums
    Tests/Interviews: UCAT | GAMSAT | Interviews
    Entrance Discussion: Graduate Medicine | Undergraduate Medicine | Dentistry
  • Register with us

    Please consider registering on MSO. Benefits of registering are:
    • Able to post and participate in the forum
    • After 10 posts: Private Message Other Users
    • After 25 posts: Access to the Chatbox
    • After 100 posts: Custom user titles and Ad-free experience

    If you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us

JPM WSU/CSU JPM: UCAT Section Weighting Discussion and Questions

The formula 60%VR + 10%DM + 15%QR + 15%AR above would give this a total around 6900-7000, way below the No guys. Throw it into the table I guarantee no math formula will be possible.

Could this person be a Rural?
Nope. To be specific, that person got 2960 - maybe that changes things a little?
 
Can someone give me a rundown of how this works. Is VR weighed higher at WSU. And also im confused regarding the whole HSC not even being done yet, surely they cant just go off predicted?

A1 has provided an explanation that is as close as we currently have. Read back through the posts.

They don't go off predicted ATAR, they don't use ATAR at all for interview invites (ETA: neither do JMP or UAdel).
 
After a good deal of trial/error I found a formula that would fit the non-GWS situation. It's 60%VR + 10%DM + 15%QR + 15%AR

Thanks for all your work A1! Much appreciated.

Q. Out of interest - Could WSU for example use the above possible UCAT formula (or whatever scaling method they have chosen) for interview selection purpose AND keep this same scaling for the UCAT % of final place offer?
Or could they have a different approach AFTER the interview eg just add all 4 sections of UCAT without any scaling for UCAT ranking added to the interview score for final place offer assuming you reach the ATAR/GPA hurdle (perhaps 25% UCAT and 75% Interview)? Is there any way of knowing? Given JMP may simply add the 4 sections for interview- ? Uni point of difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: A1
A1 has provided an explanation that is as close as we currently have. Read back through the posts.

They don't go off predicted ATAR, they don't use ATAR at all for interview invites (ETA: neither do JMP or UAdel).
Oh really? I just saw people listing their predicted ATARs so I thought that ATARs were taken into account

Also, is there any formula that can be used for GWS applicants?
 
Thanks for all your work A1! Much appreciated.

Q. Out of interest - Could WSU for example use the above possible UCAT formula (or whatever scaling method they have chosen) for interview selection purpose AND keep this same scaling for the UCAT % of final place offer?
Or could they have a different approach AFTER the interview eg just add all 4 sections of UCAT without any scaling for UCAT ranking added to the interview score for final place offer assuming you reach the ATAR/GPA hurdle (perhaps 25% UCAT and 75% Interview)? Is there any way of knowing? Given JMP may simply add the 4 sections for interview- ? Uni point of difference

I have no idea, but I very, very much doubt they change the scaling between interview invite and offer. I would imagine they work their scaling magic and assign applicants a new 'score' (likely calculated in a way similar to A1 has outlined) and that score now makes up 25% of their offer weighting. It wouldn't make sense for WSU to decide "this is important, we will scale in this manner" and then to just throw that out the window for offers.

But that is just my own speculation.

Oh really? I just saw people listing their predicted ATARs so I thought that ATARs were taken into account

People are using the standard interview invite reporting form (as some Unis will use predicted ATAR/actual ATAR - depending on timing of release). If you look at the collated thread, you will note that predicted ATARs are not recorded.
 
Wait whaaaaat your VR score is well above the 670 cutoff at the moment. Let's not give up hope! Please give out some more invites on Monday, WSU 😭

We aren’t thinking that VR has a specific cut-off (WSU have never used cut-offs and nothing we’ve seen so far suggests they are now). Rather, they weight sections differently. It’s very clear they have heavily weighted VR this year to the point that even high (or exceptionally high) scores in non-VR sections can’t quite compensate.

There’s no one VR score likely to rule a candidate out (within reason), rather it’s a combination of factors that mean the weighted UCAT conversion isn’t competitive.

That said, I still hope there are more interviews to go out on Monday!

ETA: obviously our calculations are all speculation (and A1’s stats wizarding), so if WSU admissions would like to confirm or deny, that would be fab ;)
 
Last edited:
Would have been nice to know in advance of the relative importance of VR. JMP had better not institute something similar or I might just hurl myself out a window.

VR: 640
DM: 720
QR: 830
AR: 830
SJT: 728
Total 1-4: 3020, 97th%, no invite
 
How’s that freedom of information case thingy that lovely med student was preparing going? I really don’t know much about law but I just think for something important like Med school admission, we should be able to verify if the selection criteria is being properly applied. It won’t take anything away from the schools but it will make the students’ confusion drop dramatically.

Can anyone suggest one reason why Med schools like WSU don’t reveal how they use the UCAT? I can’t think of any!

I was listening to a podcast on Spotify hosted by a doctor in the US regarding interview preparation (it’s called ‘The PreMed Years’ if anyone’s interested - highly recommend) & there were a few podcasts with deans of medicine from big name unis like New York uni as guests. I was so surprised that some unis had nothing they hid from applicants with regards to admission. They publish who got the lowest GPA & got in, who got lowest MCAT & got in, who had the lowest combination & got in, how the combination score of GPA & MCAT is calculated & what the percentage chance is for you getting an interview based on your scores. The dean said that she doesn’t understand why other unis keep it a secret when all it does is make the applicants’ lives easier.

Anyway, those are just my thoughts. To see GWS students missing out on an email on Friday with scores as high as 96%ile scores is tough. I know if I had a score that high and was a GWS student that I would definitely be expecting an invite. I’m not saying they should definitely get an interview, im saying that if we knew in advance that scores will be used in the way they are being used to determine interview invites then we can minimise huge anticipation & then disappointment.

Let’s hope we have some more emails on Monday.
 
Didn't WSU imply via Facebook replies that they weren't going to rank sections either?
I'm not sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was someone outside of the medicine admissions team running the account. We regularly hear different accounts from different staff members depending on their position at the uni.
 
GWS, VR: 560 DM: 680 QR: 900 AR: 720 - 91st
Possibly the worst combination of scores for the probable WSU selection criteria.

No invite
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The recently posted sets of scores have allowed me to fine tune the WSU formula. It now stands as 60%VR + 5%DM + 15%QR + 20%AR

The observed lowest with an invite is 732 non-GWS, 694 693 GWS. Please point out if yours is higher but no invite.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top