• Welcome to MSO!
    We are an online community for current and prospective medical, dental and allied health students and early career professionals from Australia and New Zealand.

    Please read: About MSO | Annual Welcome and Important Information | MSO Rules

    Quick Links To Forums
    Tests/Interviews: UCAT | GAMSAT | Interviews
    Entrance Discussion: Graduate Medicine | Undergraduate Medicine | Dentistry
  • Register with us

    Please consider registering on MSO. Benefits of registering are:
    • Able to post and participate in the forum
    • After 10 posts: Private Message Other Users
    • After 25 posts: Access to the Chatbox
    • After 100 posts: Custom user titles and Ad-free experience

    If you would like to get involved with MSO or have ideas, suggestions, comments, criticisms or other feedback please Contact Us

UCAT Results Discussion 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi! I was wondering with the Monash Guarantee interview threshold of 80% UMAT last year (and I think it was a 95.00 ATAR), would that UMAT/UCAT threshold change if the ATAR was higher? Like would a 72% but a 99.95 ATAR get an interview? (For an applicant with the Monash Guarantee/SEAS)
 
If you want to go to UQ desperately, then putting bonded doesn't hurt. It means that you have to go rural for 3 years after your degree. If you are ok with that, then put it as an option. However, it is highly unlikely that UQ bonded positions will drop that low, they usually have their cutoff in the low 90s.
would there be a chance for UQ bonded medicine for UCAT 89.
 
would there be a chance for UQ bonded medicine for UCAT 89.
I would do it anyway. There is a minute chance that it drops a little further this year because of the smaller cohort in QLD this year. I would not bank on it though. An 89 might be able to get you dent though.
 
Hi! I was wondering with the Monash Guarantee interview threshold of 80% UMAT last year (and I think it was a 95.00 ATAR), would that UMAT/UCAT threshold change if the ATAR was higher? Like would a 72% but a 99.95 ATAR get an interview? (For an applicant with the Monash Guarantee/SEAS)

I'm pretty sure the Monash Guarantee requires ATAR & UCAT to be both above the thresholds. However 99.95+72%ile may get you an interview in the regular pathway.
 
I'm pretty sure the Monash Guarantee requires ATAR & UCAT to be both above the thresholds. However 99.95+72%ile may get you an interview in the regular pathway.
Ah okay, do you know if Monash look at the ATAR post SEAS points for interview considerations or would it be the raw ATAR?
 
Ah okay, do you know if Monash look at the ATAR post SEAS points for interview considerations or would it be the raw ATAR?

Definitely the ATAR rank after SEAS adjustment is added to
(but when they publish data like lowest entrance ATAR etc they use raw).
 
I have an EAS bonus for living in one of the lowest socio-economic area's. does that improve my chances?
Exactly what LMG said - EAS just boosts ATAR & not UCAT marks. JMP would probably need at least 85%ile for an interview (maybe more) & WSU would need much more than a 55%ile mark for an interview. If you’re indigenous then I guess you might have a chance but if not then I think your ATAR is on the low side for admission this year.

If you’re planning to apply next year then work hard for a 6.1+ GPA & for the ucat, understand what your weak points are & how to improve them for next year’s ucat to get to a score around 90%ile. That should give you a chance at JMP & maybe WSU. If you can push your GPA even higher, then JCU would also be on the cards & they don’t look at UCAT scores at all.

Doing this will also would put you a year closer to graduate entry medicine too. Maybe the GAMSAT might be your thing?

Good luck :)
 
After getting an invite probability of WSU offer is around 30% for non-GWS, 40% GWS.

Last year's UNSW borderline for interview (we are quite sure of this since there were a few just under didn't get invited) was 99.2+92%ile or equiv combo. My unscientific rule of thumb for equivalent is 1%ile = 0.1 ATAR so your 99.0+95%ile is just around that mark. Scraping an interview means only 10-20% chance getting a place offer since you are among the lowest in the interview cohort, you need a high enough interview score to (when combined with ATAR+UCAT) lift you into the top third overall.
Do most of the Uni's work this way where you receive a weighting/mark for each of ATAR, UCAT and Interview resulting in an overall score -versus reaching the threshold for ATAR & UCAT and then after acheiving this coming down to the interview only?
 
Do most of the Uni's work this way where you receive a weighting/mark for each of ATAR, UCAT and Interview resulting in an overall score -versus reaching the threshold for ATAR & UCAT and then after acheiving this coming down to the interview only?
Yes, for the universities that do interview, the latter is unique to JMP (and WSU, but they consider 75% interview and 25% UCAT score). Criteria for each school can be viewed here: [Undergrad] - (2019 Updated) Med schools Selection Criteria Y12s & Non-standards
 
Do most of the Uni's work this way where you receive a weighting/mark for each of ATAR, UCAT and Interview resulting in an overall score -versus reaching the threshold for ATAR & UCAT and then after acheiving this coming down to the interview only?

Adding to Crow's reply here's quick summary of ATAR/UCAT/Interview weightings for place offer.

Griffith, Melb : 100 / 0 / 0 (Melb requires to pass an interview in 3rd year)
Flinders : 90 / 10 / 0
UQ : 0 / 100 / 0
JMP, USyd : 0 / 0 / 100
WSU : 0 / 25 / 75
Adelaide, Curtin : 40 / 20 / 40
Monash, UWA : 33 / 33 / 33

UNSW : 33 / 33 / 33 stated previously, has now changed to (unspecified) combination of the three.
My hunch is it is still so, except UNSW reserves the rights to reject those with ultra high ATAR+UCAT but a miserable interview. Using 33/33/33 these applicants would qualify for top third overall on their ATAR+UCAT's strength alone, thus UNSW avoids stating it explicitly.

UTas is too complicated to summarise. JCU is *probably* 33/33/33 ATAR/Interview/Rurality (this rurality rating also applies to non-rurals, they just get a near zero rating I guess).
 
Adding to Crow's reply here's quick summary of ATAR/UCAT/Interview weightings for place offer.

Griffith, Melb : 100 / 0 / 0 (Melb requires to pass an interview in 3rd year)
Flinders : 90 / 10 / 0
UQ : 0 / 100 / 0
JMP, USyd : 0 / 0 / 100
WSU : 0 / 25 / 75
Adelaide, Curtin : 40 / 20 / 40
Monash, UWA : 33 / 33 / 33

UNSW : 33 / 33 / 33 stated previously, has now changed to (unspecified) combination of the three.
My hunch is it is still so, except UNSW reserves the rights to reject those with ultra high ATAR+UCAT but a miserable interview. Using 33/33/33 these applicants would qualify for top third overall on their ATAR+UCAT's strength alone, thus UNSW avoids stating it explicitly.

UTas is too complicated to summarise. JCU is *probably* 33/33/33 ATAR/Interview/Rurality (this rurality rating also applies to non-rurals, they just get a near zero rating I guess).

Wow thanks - I wonder if you can get a decent Rurality score for JCU if you live in metro but have an afffinity with the country - my parents were both raised on farms but moved to acreage on the city outskirts so we had better access to education - I'd rather live country and would be estatic with a bonded spot.
 
Adding to Crow's reply here's quick summary of ATAR/UCAT/Interview weightings for place offer.

Griffith, Melb : 100 / 0 / 0 (Melb requires to pass an interview in 3rd year)
Flinders : 90 / 10 / 0
UQ : 0 / 100 / 0
JMP, USyd : 0 / 0 / 100
WSU : 0 / 25 / 75
Adelaide, Curtin : 40 / 20 / 40
Monash, UWA : 33 / 33 / 33

UNSW : 33 / 33 / 33 stated previously, has now changed to (unspecified) combination of the three.
My hunch is it is still so, except UNSW reserves the rights to reject those with ultra high ATAR+UCAT but a miserable interview. Using 33/33/33 these applicants would qualify for top third overall on their ATAR+UCAT's strength alone, thus UNSW avoids stating it explicitly.

UTas is too complicated to summarise. JCU is *probably* 33/33/33 ATAR/Interview/Rurality (this rurality rating also applies to non-rurals, they just get a near zero rating I guess).
UWA section is wrong, it should be 40/20/40 according to : High Academic Achievement Direct Pathway to MD and DMD > Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences: The University of Western Australia
using a ratio of 1:2:2. I would think this is more correct because a. thats what they told us, b. they have to compete with curtin, c. this comes directly from the meddent section of uwa's website.
 
Wow thanks - I wonder if you can get a decent Rurality score for JCU if you live in metro but have an afffinity with the country - my parents were both raised on farms but moved to acreage on the city outskirts so we had better access to education - I'd rather live country and would be estatic with a bonded spot.
According to Ben the rurality score is derived from a combination of a) Rurality index (i.e. RA 1-5 - which you can't change) and b) Rurality score (i.e. a "how likely is this person to go rural" based on your interview responses). Naturally rural-background students have an advantage but if you demonstrate a genuine desire to pursue a career rurally in the interview then you could still obtain a sufficient "rurality score" as a metro applicant.

Remember that current JCU cohorts are made up of over 50% RA-1 students, so you certainly can still obtain the score you need for a place offer as a metro applicant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top